Home Blog Page 263

Samsung demos MRAM chip with embedded compute for AI

Samsung has demonstrated an in-memory computing MRAM chip processing stored data, and accurately working on AI problems such as face detection. A Nature paper is coming to explain how it was done

This technology could provide low-power dedicated AI chips combining compute and storage to reduce data movement, speed processing and lower energy use. It could also help develop neuromorphic computing — analogous to how masses of neurons and synapses in the brain inter-operate.

Lead paper author Dr Seungchul Jung is quoted in Samsung’s announcement: “In-memory computing draws similarity to the brain in the sense that in the brain, computing also occurs within the network of biological memories, or synapses, the points where neurons touch one another.

“In fact, while the computing performed by our MRAM network for now has a different purpose from the computing performed by the brain, such solid-state memory network may in the future be used as a platform to mimic the brain by modelling the brain’s synapse connectivity.”

MRAM technology

MRAM or magneto-resistive RAM, also known as spin-transfer torque magneto-resistive RAM (STT-MRAM), relies on the different spin directions of electrons to signal a binary one or zero. 

It is a non-volatile memory technology with greater speed and endurance than NAND. While it has been actively investigated as a possibility for replacing SRAM for many years, progress has been limited as it is a difficult technology to develop, with high manufacturing costs.

As we wrote back in 2018, STT-MRAM cells or storage elements have two ferromagnetic plates, electrodes, separated by non-magnetic material. One high-coercivity electrode has its magnetism pinned because it needs a larger magnet field or spin-polarised current to change its magnetic orientation compared to the other electrode.

This second, lower coercivity electrode is called a free layer and its north-south orientation can be changed more easily. Binary values are stored by making the free electrode have the same, parallel, north-south orientation as the reference electrode or a different, anti-parallel one. The electrical resistance of the cell, due to the spin-polarised electron tunnelling effect, is different in each state, indicating a binary value.

The complexity of the technology can be seen in developer Spin Memory’s product, using a 3D two-level cell crossbar array — it involves more than 250 separate patents.

Spin Memory MRAM crossbar graphic.

Everspin is another MRAM developer and its STT-MRAM offers higher write and read speeds than DRAM and has been used by IBM in its FlashSystem 9100 and Storwise V7000 systems. In effect, MRAM is in commercial production already but it is a niche technology.

Compute this

Samsung’s neat idea is to use MRAM differently, by adding compute elements to an MRAM chip built as a 64×64 cell crossbar array, and use its data access speed and non-volatility along with in-chip parallel processing to speed AI tasks. Naturally the scope of the compute is limited — you can’t realistically add general-purpose CPU cores to blocks of cells in a memory chip, but you can add small processors with limited instruction sets.

Samsung has been working on processing-in-memory (PIM) ideas for some time. For example, it has an Aquabolt-XL HBM2 chip embedding a programmable computing unit (PCU) inside each memory bank, minimising the need for data movement.

Samsung MRAM tack

The Samsung MRAM researchers took a different tack. They thought that the low resistance of MRAM cells meant that MRAM PIM chips would need more power than computing ReRAM and Phased Change Memory (PCM) technologies. But if they changed the MRAM chip design or architecture from what is called “current-sum” to an alternative “resistance sum” for analogue multiply–accumulate operations, which they say addresses the problem of small resistances of individual MRAM devices.

Analogue AI PIM technology promises to use much less electrical power than computing artificial neural networks (ANNs) in digital processors. 

We’d like to understand this much more but the details are hidden behind scientific paper paywalls. The paper’s available diagrams talk about Artificial Neural Networks and performing analogue vector–matrix multiplication to transfer data from a layer to the next. The paper abstract mentions “multiply–accumulate operations prevalent in artificial neural networks.“

Samsung MRAM PIM paper diagram.

We have found a preliminary copy, and its first page compares in-memory processing and conventional Von Neuman architecture. “The rate at which data can be transferred between the processing unit and the memory unit represents a fundamental limitation of modern computers, known as the memory wall. In-memory computing is an approach that attempts to address this issue by designing systems that compute within the memory, thus eliminating the energy-intensive and time-consuming data movement that plagues current designs.”

The researchers’ MRAM crossbar array design is explained like this: “With each memory storing a synaptic weight as its conductance value, the crossbar array executes the vector–matrix multiplication, the most prevalent ANN algebra. Each column yields a dot product between the input voltage vector fed to the rows and the column weight vector, by first multiplying the memory conductance and the input voltage at each row–column cross-point via Ohm’s law and subsequently summing the resulting cross-point currents along the column via Kirchhoff’s law.

“This physical matrix multiplication, or analogue multiply–accumulate (MAC) operation, consumes far less power than its digital counterpart.”

Once the researchers had the designed chip available they tested it on a couple of classic AI problems. It achieved an accuracy of 98 per cent in classification of hand-written digits and a 93 per cent accuracy in detecting faces from scenes.

Comment

This compute-in memory MRAM chip looks highly specialised for specific types of AI problems and is unlikely to appear in enterprise computing until it needs to deal with such problems in a routine way.

Bootnote: The paper, “A crossbar array of magnetoresistive memory devices for in-memory computing”,  has been published online by Nature and paper-based publication is coming shortly. 

The research was led by Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology (SAIT) in collaboration with Samsung Electronics Foundry Business and Semiconductor R&D Center. The first author of the paper, Dr Seungchul Jung, staff researcher at SAIT, and the co-corresponding authors Dr Donhee Ham, fellow of SAIT and professor of Harvard University, and Dr Sang Joon Kim, vice president of technology at SAIT, led the research.

HSMR

HSMR – Hybrid Shingled Magnetic Media Recording disk drives. Hybrid SMR drives have both a conventional non-shingled magnetic recording (Conventional PMR or CMR) region and an SMR region. HSMR drives were specified by Meta’s (then Facebook) Open Compute Project (OCP) back in the 2012 era with OCP18. Western Digital and Seagate participated in the HSMR project. The idea is to spread the storage of hot data across across a set of disk drives by having hot data CMR regions on each drive rather than having the hot data occupy the totality of a disk’s surface, so as to increase the data access rate. The rest of an HSMR drive would be filled with cold data in an SMR region. This is an example of zoned namespace media.

OCP18 HSMR document diagram.

Download this OCP18 document to find out more.

Storage news ticker – January 12

IBM Cloud Pak for Data is a unified data and AI platform that runs on any cloud. It’s now available on the Azure Marketplace along with the IBM Cloud Pak for Data BYOL variant.

Nvidia has bought Bright Computing, which makes HPC management software, for an undisclosed sum. Bright Computing’s customer list includes Boeing, NASA, Tesla, Johns Hopkins University and Siemens. Companies in health care, financial services, manufacturing and other markets use Bright Cluster Management software to set up and run clusters of servers linked by high-speed networks into a single unit. The company’s employees will join Nvidia, and transaction details are not being disclosed.

DataCentre Dynamics reports “51 international companies who lost data when OVHcloud’s SBG2 datacenter in Strasbourg burnt down in March 2021 have joined a class action claiming up to €1.9 million in damages.” Read the story here.

MultiPay Group, a global payments technology company, has signed with Percona, which provides open source database software and services, to provide Managed Services for its MySQL open source database deployments. MultiPay provides an API that acts as a single point of integration between any payment method and any acquirer. It relies on Percona XtraDB Cluster and Percona Monitoring and Management for its operational database and management.

Kubernetes data management and operator 5G systems supplier Robin.io announced a strategic collaboration with STL, an integrator of digital networks, to offer XaaS (anything as-a-service). The XaaS offering will leverage the STL Enterprise Marketplace Platform with the Robin Cloud-Native Platform (CNP) to deliver enterprise applications and 5G services. Partha Seetala, founder and CEO of Robin.io, said: “Built on the foundation of cloud-native, zero-touch automation and open architectures, the integrated marketplace solution will enable CSPs to deliver new revenue models and accelerate customer onboarding while keeping service delivery costs in check. The marketplace solution built jointly by STL and Robin.io for service providers and enterprises will disrupt the way XaaS frameworks are built and delivered.”

ThreeFold says its new highly energy-efficient internet infrastructure offers cloud storage that consumes 90 per cent less energy than other storage systems, thanks to its lightweight operating system and peer-to-peer design. It is the world’s first and largest peer-to-peer Carbon Negative Internet Grid in the world. Its grid, in contrast to the current centralized model of hyper-scale and power-hungry datacentres, uses a blockchain decentralized model to spread internet access throughout the whole world by enabling anyone to participate in providing internet capacity (Compute, Storage, and Networking).

Colourful ExaGrid spills the competitive beans

We had a briefing from ExaGrid President and CEO Bill Andrews after hearing about its final 2021 quarter results. He provided us with a little more colour, as he put it.

Blocks & Files: Who else is primarily focussed on making backup appliances?

Bill Andrews.

Bill Andrews: No vendor is focused right now on building or advancing a dedicated appliance for backup. We appear to be the only ones constantly adding to the product feature set.

On what do you base your view of the data protection target market?

We have over 160 in our sales org and soon will have over 200. We truly do see the market for what it is, because we are talking to a wide range of customers. We get in through resellers bringing us in but we also have 36 inside sales reps that cold call into named accounts.

What competing suppliers and products do you encounter?

Since we are in the upper mid-market to the enterprise the backup applications we see in the market that we sit behind are Veritas NetBackup, Commvault, Oracle RMAN, IBM Spectrum Protect, Dell Networker, Dell Avamar.

Veeam continues to move upmarket and has a good base. We only see Rubrik and Cohesity if the customer is looking to switch one of the above and then ExaGrid teams up with either Veeam, Commvault or HYCU to compete.

You say you have a 75 per cent win rate and bid into customers with existing backup target systems. Who are you meeting and beating?

When we go into accounts we replace the following in the following order:

  1. Primary storage disk behind Veeam, Commvault and IBM Spectrum Protect;
  2. Dell Data Domain behind Veeam, Veritas NetBackup, Oracle RMAN;
  3. Veritas 5300/5400 appliances behind Veritas NetBackup;
  4. HPE StoreOnce behind Veeam;
  5. Dell Data Domain behind Commvault;
  6. Dell Data Domain behind IBM Spectrum Protect;
  7. We also replace the storage and deduplication appliances behind BackupExec, Acronis and many others. ExaGrid supports 25 backup applications and utilities.

Do you meet Cohesity or Rubrik in the deals ExaGrid bids for?

When the customer is looking to change both the backup storage and the backup application then we will see Rubrik and Cohesity as they can only sell if the customer is replacing both the backup application and the backup storage, at the same time. Most of the time it is Veeam to ExaGrid replacing Dell Networker to Dell Data Domain or Dell Avamar to Dell Data Domain that we replace. Most Networker and Avamar customers are leaving at high speed. We will see Rubrik or Cohesity in these deals. We don’t see many Commvault or NetBackup accounts turning over, mostly Dell Networker and Dell Avamar.

If in a Nutanix environment ExaGrid will go in with HYCU–ExaGrid versus Veeam–ExaGrid. In this case, HYCU–ExaGrid competes with Rubrik or Cohesity.

Sometimes, more on a per-case basis, we work with Commvault to ExaGrid in some deals.

The net is when a customer is changing their backup application then they will look at Veeam–-ExaGrid, HYCU–ExaGrid, Commvault to disk, Commvault–ExaGrid, Rubrik, Cohesity [in that order].

Comment

Andrews does not mention Quantum’s DXI systems at all, suggesting that they just do not appear — or appear rarely — in what Andrews refers to as upper-mid-market and enterprise markets. Quantum’s newest DXi V5000 offering is targeted at remote and branch offices.

Kastenated – Backblaze partners Veeam’s container protection BU

Storage pod
Storage pod

Kasten — a business unit of Veeam dedicated to protecting Kubernetes application data — has added Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage to its set of supported backup target systems.

Nilay Patel.

B2 Cloud Storage is an S3-compatible public cloud object store with Object Lock capabilities to prevent ransomware corrupting or deleting its stored backups.

Nilay Patel, VP of sales and partnerships at Backblaze, offered a statement: “Kubernetes containers are the standard for many organisations building, deploying, and scaling applications with portability and efficiency. Backblaze and Kasten together offer a compelling solution to support these organisations’ business continuity needs with set-it-and-forget-it ease and cost effectiveness.”

Kasten’s K10 product protects Kubernetes-orchestrated containerised applications. It supports backing up the HPE Ezmeral Container Platform, Nutanix Karbon, Red Hat OpenShift, Microsoft Azure Stack, and others, and sending backup to NFS, EMC and NetApp for example, and S3 targets. These include AWS, Azure, Google, MinIO and Scality object storage, meaning both on-premises and public cloud targets. B2 Cloud Storage has now been added to the list.

Backblaze charges customers by storage capacity used ($0.005/GB/month vs AWS $0.021/GB/month) and has low data egress fees ($0.01/GB vs AWS S3’s $0.05/GB) — differentiating it from the the main public clouds. With B2 there are no data retention penalties for deleting past backups either.

Faster data access coming – PCIe generation 6 spec unveiled

The PCIe SIG has released the official PCIe gen 6 specification, which doubles PCIe 5 speed to 256GB/sec across 16 lanes.

PCIe system designers can use this to double existing bandwidth across PCIe lanes, or halve the number of lanes for the same bandwidth — thus freeing up PCIe lane slots.

Al Yanes, PCI-SIG chairperson and president, issued a quote: “PCI-SIG is pleased to announce the release of the PCIe 6.0 specification less than three years after the PCIe 5.0 specification. PCIe 6.0 technology is the cost-effective and scalable interconnect solution that will continue to impact data-intensive markets like datacenter, artificial intelligence/machine learning, HPC, automotive, IoT, and military/aerospace, while also protecting industry investments by maintaining backwards compatibility with all previous generations of PCIe technology.”

PCIe SIG chart showing generational speed increases.

Greg Wong, founder and principal analyst at Forward Insights, said: “The PCI Express SSD market [is] forecasted to grow at a CAGR of 40 per cent to over 800 exabytes by 2025. With the storage industry transitioning to PCIe 4.0 technology and on the cusp of introducing PCIe 5.0 technology, companies will begin adopting PCIe 6.0 technology in their roadmaps to future-proof their products and take advantage of the high bandwidth and low latency that PCI Express technology offers.”

PCIe generational transfer speed details table.

NVMe data access across a PCIe 6 bus should be faster, which will increase application execution speed. With the CXL (Compute eXpress Link) bus being developed on a PCIe 5 base, and capable of providing dispersed memory configurations, a future version based on PCIe 6 should reduce the latency of memory accesses across the link.

PCIe market growth estimate. Client systems take the most shipments, followed by cloud hyperscalers.

We expect the first SSDs supporting PCIe 6 to appear in the 2023–2024 timeframe, with gaming system designers leading the way.

Micron’s incredibly dense gumstick SSD

Micron has announced the 2400 — a 2TB gumstick-sized PCIe 4 SSD using 176 layer 3D NAND formatted with QLC (4bits/cell), doubling the performance of the prior 2210 96-layer QLC product

Both products have an NVMe interface and are for PCs and notebook systems, including small and thin laptop designs. Micron says the 2400 is the world’s first 176-layer QLC NAND SSD and it uses charge trap technology with a CMOS-under-array design.

Jeremy Werner, corporate VP and GM of Micron’s Storage Business Unit, said in the release that the company expects “the new 2400 PCIe 4 SSD will significantly accelerate the adoption of QLC in client devices as it enables broader design options and more affordable capacity”.

The 2400 is available in three single-sided M.2 formats — 2230, 2242 and 2280 — with three capacity options in each case: 512GB, 1TB and 2TB. There must be a lot of empty space in the 2280 product as this picture indicates:

Micron competitor SK hynix also has a 176-layer 2TB M.2 SSD — its 2280 Platinum P41 drive for gamers. It was announced earlier this month, though SK hynix did not reveal the cell format. We suspect it was TLC (3bits/cell) as it has much higher performance than the 2400.

The 2400 has no on-board DRAM, utilising a host memory buffer instead. Like the 2100 it has an SLC cache-based dynamic write acceleration feature. Other features include hardware-based AES 256-bit encryption, RAIN and SMART, TCG Opal 2.01, TCG Pyrite 2.01, Micron Storage Executive management tool, sanitise erase and secure boot.

We have tabulated the details of Micron’s PCIe 4 M.2 format SSDs for comparison:

Micron says the 2400 has 33 per cent higher I/O speed (ONFI 4.x — 1600MT/s vs 1200MT/s) and 24 per cent lower read latency than the 96-layer QLC NAND used in the 2100. It does not provide an actual latency number. The table above shows that the 2400 is more than twice as fast as the 2100 in terms of random read/write IOPS and sequential read and write performance.

However its endurance is less. This is expressed in terabytes written (TBW) terms, and the 2100 provided 180TBW at the 512GB capacity point, 360TBW at 1TB and 720TBW at 2TB. The equivalent 2400 ratings are: 512GB — 150TBW; 1TB — 300TBW; and 2TB — 600TBW. This lower endurance may be a concern in high write workload environments — think of the 2400 as a boot and mixed read/write device.

Its active idle power has been reduced by half from the 2100. Micron said it is designed to meet Intel Project Athena requirements for more than nine hours of real-world battery life on laptops when using high-definition displays. The power draw is listed in a 2400 product brief table:

According to its product brief the 2100’s active idle power is <400mW — considerably higher. Its active read power is <4,000mW but Micron doesn’t provide an equivalent number for the 2400.

The 2400 will be incorporated into some Micron Crucial consumer SSDs, and available as a component for system designers.

Sticking to its knitting – ExaGrid breaks records again

Backup target array supplier ExaGrid has notched up another record-breaking quarter with bookings and revenue highs set in the USA, Canada, Latin America, EMEA and APAC regions.

It brought on 174 new customers in the quarter ended December 31, 2021, with 49 six-figure new customer deals and two seven-figure ones. The total active customer count has passed 3,200 and the company, founded in 2002, has been cash-positive for the last five quarters. It says its competitive win rate is 75 per cent, which must make for some unhappy competitors. Also 40 per cent of its revenue is due to ARR (Annual Recurring Revenue).

Bill Andrews.

Bill Andrews, ExaGrid’s President and CEO, is clear about why the win rate is high: “ExaGrid reduces the cost of backup storage while maintaining performance and scalability. All of the first-generation deduplication appliances such as Dell EMC Data Domain, HPE StoreOnce, and Veritas 5340, are slow for backup, slow for restores and don’t scale well. 

“Low-cost primary storage disk is too expensive for long-term backup storage. You need to have an integrated approach that brings the performance of backing up to disk but also data deduplication for efficient long-term retention backup storage. ExaGrid’s Tiered Backup Storage provides the best of both worlds.”

The Tiered Backup Storage refers to scale-out ExaGrid’s non-deduplicated landing zone for new backup datasets providing the fastest restores. Then the data in the sets is deduplicated using a global index, not one restricted to the local array, and moved to a non-network-facing repository for longer-term storage.

We have tabulated ExaGrid’s growth numbers for 2021:

The 39 per cent full-year revenue growth rate from 2020 is a good number and we doubt if it will be matched by competitors Dell EMC (PowerProtect), HPE (StoreOnce), Quantum (DXi), and Veritas. ExaGrid is looking to hire another 60 inside and field sales heads because it is growing so quickly.

Comment

As SSDs and the public cloud come to dominate enterprise IT, we see these things as potential opportunities for ExaGrid. For example, its disk-based landing zone could expand to include QLC (4bits/cell) SSDs, possibly deduplicated to lower the cost, and so enable faster restores still, with a view to responding to Pure Storage’s FlashBlade and also to VAST Data.

Bill Andrews is not a fan of using SSDs though. He tells us “It is very expensive and drives the cost of backup storage through the Moon. Very few organisations can afford SSD for backup.” Also “Customers are blown away that we are the same or faster than SSD for backup. SSD is really optimized for small writes such as database transactions. It is not optimized for extremely large backup jobs. We do side by side testing all the time.”

ExaGrid could port its software to the public cloud — meaning Amazon, Azure and GCP — and provide a multi-hybrid cloud backup environment. It all depends upon how ExaGrid sees itself: as an on-premises backup target array supplier, at which it is clearly doing very well, or as a potential hybrid and multi-cloud backup target supplier with a cloud-like business model.

Andrews said ExaGrid is adapting to the cloud. “We currently replicate from a physical onsite appliances into AWS for disaster recovery. By summer of this year we’ll replicate from physical onsite appliances into Azure for disaster recovery. Longer term (no rush as we are getting no market pressure) we will have a version of ExaGrid that runs in the clouds for data that lives and is backed up in the clouds.”

Contain yourselves: VMware says Tanzu AP smashes the wall of YAMLs, and it’s out now

VMware has announced general availability of its Tanzu Application Platform.

The Tanzu AP provides an app-aware method, with pre-configured templates and a Kubernetes abstraction layer, for developing containerised applications in a multi-cloud environment. Tanzu is VMware’s project to provide DevOps Kubernetes development facilities, so that containerised applications can run alongside virtual machines (VMs) in VMware’s vSphere hypervisor environment.

The aim is to enable Kubernetes app development to become mainstream without killing the VM app environment. A VMware blog, shown to us before going live, reads “many enterprises are experiencing the challenges of navigating the sprawling and complex cloud-native ecosystem and the steep learning curve that comes with it.” It mentions “seemingly incoherent tools that are tough to set up and maintain, work inconsistently across teams and connecting them to other apps and infrastructure is extremely complex,” with developers having to deal with a “wall of YAMLs”* to configure applications.

Tanzu is intended to bring order to this chaos and so increase developer productivity. On the operations side, “Operation teams … need to manage too many bespoke software supply chains and face trouble integrating existing DevOps and security practices, while managing multiple cloud environments running multiple apps.”

The blog argues that “VMware Tanzu Application Platform is a modular, application-aware platform that provides a rich set of developer tooling and a pre-paved path to production to build and deploy software quickly and securely on any compliant public cloud or on-premises Kubernetes cluster.”

It claims that “With Tanzu Application Platform you can deliver revenue-generating applications to market faster because your developers can spend more time building great software instead of toiling and stitching components together.”

The YAML wall is replaced with “an end-to-end supply chain, with its components pre-instrumented to work together seamlessly out of the box”. This is called a Secure Software Supply Chain workflow. A Tanzu build service uses Cloud Native Buildpacks to automatically create containers from validated building blocks and update them with no manual intervention. VMware claims that “As developers commit code, the software supply chain is triggered automatically, providing a continuous path to production.”

It all sounds wonderful.

*Bootnote: YAML is an acronym originally standing for for “Yet Another Markup Language” but then altered to mean “YAML Ain’t Markup Language”. 

Storage News ticker – January 11

Storage news
Storage news

Cobalt Iron, which provides SaaS-based enterprise data protection, has received US Patent 11206306 on its technology for analytics-based cloud brokering of data protection operations. The patented techniques use unique operational and infrastructure analytics to respond to changing conditions and to determine optimal usage of cloud and on-premises resources. If there is a cyber-event in process against certain cloud computing resources, or if there is a change in the cost or availability of a cloud resource, the techniques can dynamically reconfigure cloud computing operations to use a combination of on-premises and/or other cloud resources.They will be implemented in Cobalt Iron’s Compass offering, and will enable Compass to optimize cloud and on-premises computing resources automatically, making IT operations more secure, more cost-effective, and better-performing. 

Doug Balog.

Cloud-enabled Backup-as-a-Service and StorSafe container-based archiver vendor FalconStor has appointed former IBM executive Doug Balog as its Strategic Executive Advisor. Blog said: “I am impressed by the progress the team has made in bringing this expertise to the hybrid cloud data protection market and by the commitment it is making to the MSP community to help make customers and partners successful technically and financially. Particularly, IBM i customers and MSPs would seem to benefit materially from FalconStor’s deep technology integration with the IBM i platform for deduplication, backup, replication and data migration to the cloud.”

HPE StoreEver tape libraries now support LTO-9 tape, with its up to 45TB compressed capacity (18TB native) and transfer speeds of up to 1000MB/sec (for systems with full height drives and 800MB/sec for those with half height). It’s available for the following entry- and mid-range HPE StoreEver solutions:

  • HPE StoreEver LTO-9 45000 internal and external standalone tape drives
  • HPE StoreEver MSL 1/8 autoloader
  • HPE StoreEver MSL 2024 tape library
  • HPE StoreEver MSL3040 tape library
  • HPE StoreEver MSL6480 tape library

Infinidat, which gets 90 per cent of its revenues from a 500+ partner channel, has announced some channel awards:

  • Partner of the Year 
    • Americas – Mainline Information Systems, Inc.
    • EMEA – I.A.N. s.r.l.
    • APJ – SCSK Corporation
  • The High Velocity Award – Mark III Systems
  • The High Flyer – Dynamix Group, Inc.
  • The Ultimate Contributor – OneNeck IT Solutions
  • The Cloud Buster Award – SnowCap Technologies
  • Distributor of the Year
    • EMEA – Pinnacle Micro (Pty) Ltd.
    • APJ – Networld Corporation
  • Marketing Partner of the Year – ASBISc Enterprises Plc

File and object data manager and analyser Komprise more than doubled its revenues and the amount of data under management in 2021 compared to 2020. It says it “has seen rampant market uptake of its value proposition for unstructured data management, enabling massive data storage savings while facilitating faster, more automated analytics projects in the cloud.” Komprise revenues, which are subscriptions, grew by 115 per cent year-over-year. New customer acquisition grew 200 per cent year-on-year.

NSA Inc. says it buys in used backup tapes, cleans them, and sells them on. It purchases thousands of used tapes per month, brings them to facilities near Boston, eradicates all the data off every tape that comes in and then offers a Certificate of Data Destruction upon completion. NSA has a buyback offer or a “Sort N’ Settle” option where it sorts and inventories the tapes in house and sends a cheque out accordingly. It also sells a full line of Certified LTO Tapes (LTO-6 for older) at lower cost than brand new tapes.

Phison Electronics Corp. announced that its SD Express storage offering is the first product to pass the SD Association’s SD Express/UHS-II Verification Program (SVP). This verification indicates that these products meet interface standards, and will operate and perform properly.

Data management and SaaS protection company Redstor announced a growth investment from Bregal Milestone, a European technology growth capital firm. Redstor will use the undisclosed amount of financing to fuel its international expansion into the United States and accelerate its AI-enabled platform and overall growth. It has more than 40,000 customers worldwide. Previous Redstor investor Beech Tree Private Equity realized its investment in full as part of the transaction.

RiverMeadow has an integrated cloud migration and disaster recovery offering. It applies to VMware vSphere workloads that run on-premise or in VMware on any public cloud with the use of Object Storage for cost-effective DR. A table lists the options;

Intel poaches Micron’s CFO to look after its own finances

Intel has hired a new EVP and CFO: David Zinsner has moved across from Micron, Intel’s former 3D XPoint manufacturing partner, where he held the same positions.

On January 17 Zinsner will take over from retiring Intel CFO George Davis, 62, who leaves in May, providing a transition period in which the new CFO can learn the ropes. Zinsner joined Micron as its CFO in February 2018, coming from being President and COO at Affirmed Networks, and SVP and CFO at Analog Devices before that.

David Zinsner.

Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger, to whom Zinsner will report, provided the main announcement quote: “Dave is a proven finance leader, who brings a unique combination of strategic thought, deep knowledge of semiconductors and manufacturing, capital allocation discipline, and a track record of value creation for shareholders. I look forward to partnering with Dave as we continue to execute our strategy to usher in a new era of innovation and achieve our goal of unquestioned leadership in every category in which we compete.”

Zinsner was similarly upbeat. “Intel’s scale, re-invigorated culture and depth of technical talent positions the company to capitalise on the unprecedented demand for semiconductors across the globe.”

Davis announced his forthcoming retirement in August last year, eight months after Gelsinger was hired as Intel’s CEO. An Intel spokesperson assured the Wall Street Journal that the two events were unrelated.

As a CFO at a US NAND and DRAM semiconductor company, Zinsner has knowledge and experience relevant to his Intel role — not least Micron’s view on 3D XPoint, which may now feed into Intel’s own view of the prospects for its 3D XPoint-based Optane product range. Micron exited the 3D XPoint manufacturing business in March last year, preferring to spend the invested cash elsewhere for a greater potential return.

Wells Fargo analyst Aaron Rakers told subscribers that Micron EVP and Chief Business Officer, Sumit Sadana, will be Micron’s interim CFO while the firm runs a search for his replacement. Rakers thinks that Zinsner’s hire is a net positive for Intel.

Intel has also promoted 25-year company veteran EVP Michelle Johnston Holthaus, currently EVP and GM of the Sales, Marketing and Communications Group,  to run its Client Computing Group. Gregory Bryant, the current Client Computing Group EVP and GM, is resigning at the end of January.

Stealth startup Polar Security wants to prevent pain deep in the DevOps security vortex

Stealthy Israeli data security startup Polar Security has published a website explaining its intention to discover businesses’ managed, unmanaged and shadow data automatically — and secure it.

The company was started up in January 2021 by co-founders Guy Shanny (CEO) and Roey Yaacovi (CTO), and its chairman is Dov Yoran. Glilot Capital Partners and IBI TechFund are listed as investors with an undisclosed amount of funding. Polar has offices in Tel Aviv and, already, in San Jose.

Guy Shanny (left) and Roey Yaacovi (right).

The website claims its product will halt exhausting gap-bridging ping-pong between R&D, Security, and Data Governance teams to ensure data compliance and respond to security pain in the DevOps security vortex.

Polar’s technology platform, which is agentless and non-intrusive, is claimed to automatically detect all cloud-native data stores, and maintains continuous visibility across cloud accounts, regions, VPCs and subnets, and their shadow data. It says this is constantly created by R&D, often without documentation. Once detected, the data is automatically labelled to identify valuable and sensitive data with reference to GDPR, CCPA, PCI, PIIs, HIPPA, and other data classifications.

There can be automated enforcement of pre-emptive sensitive data security and compliance controls. Also, once identified, data flow and access can be tracked. Polar says this can prevent sensitive data leakage and pre-empt regulatory exposure. The platform can identify data at risk and provide actionable recommendations to restore data security, mitigate data vulnerability and compliance violations before costly escalation.

Polar Security home page.

Polar’s software can connect to a business’s IT system in minutes and is zero-touch — with no SDKs, network scanners or sidecars (supporting processes or services) needed, just read-only data access permission.

Identified use cases include automated data store inventory, auditing data flow security, preventing sensitive data exposure, ensuring ransomware-resilient sensitive data stores, and preventing compliance violations.

Shanny spent ten and a half years in the Office of the Prime Minster of Israel working in the cybersecurity field. While a teenage high school student he started FreshServ — a private web vulnerability and hosting company. Yaacovi also worked in the Israeli Prime Minister’s Office but then joined Check Point Software Technologies as a software engineer.

Yoran has a background of working at Cisco — founding malware analysis startup ThreatGRID which was bought by Cisco — and Symantec. He is based in New York and a partner at MetroSITE Group which participates in early-stage cybersecurity investments and provides advisory services.