Home Blog Page 360

Qumulo adds encryption to Hybrid File Software

Qumulo has added end-to-end encryption to Hybrid File Software in an upgrade that also adds role-based access control and integrated backup.

The scale out filer startup said customers of Hybrid File Software version 3 can avoid the need for separate backup products. In other words, Qumulo wants to store all of a customer’s files and unstructured data, and bridge the on-premises and public cloud environments. 

Ben Gitenstein, VP of product at Qumulo, said in a statement: “The release of Qumulo’s Hybrid File Software v3 makes it simple to consolidate an entire organisation’s unstructured data, gain visibility into the information, and move data to the applications that will leverage it, wherever it resides, on-prem or in the cloud.”

Its software delivers faster IO for small file data sets and adds extra management analytic data, such as snapshot capacity usage and latency by IP address. Qumulos has extended API functionality to automate all the new v3 feature capabilities.

Qumulo P-368T

Qumulo was founded in 2012 by former Isilon execs and Dell EMC’s Isilon remains its nearest technology competitor. The venture-backed startup has received $223m in funding to date and Coldago Research has put the company on its roll-call of data storage unicorns.

Qumulo today announced the P368T, a top-end all-NVMe flash system with 368TB raw capacity in its 2U x 24 drive bay chassis. It doubles the current high-end P184T’s capacity by using 15.36TB drives instead of 7.68TB SSDs. The CPU, memory and IO ports are the same as those for the P184T. A Qumulo cluster can now scale out past 36PB with 100 nodes in the cluster.

In comparison, the Isilon F800 all-flash filer has 60 drives in its 4 node x 4U chassis with up to 924TB capacity using 15.36TB drives.  The maximum Isilon all-flash cluster size is 252 nodes and 58PB capacity.

Channel boost

Qumulo has also increased its channel partner presence. HPE sells Qumulo software running on Apollo servers and Qumulo today announced that it now provides encryption of data in-flight via SMBv3 and encryption at-rest on HPE’s Apollo appliances.HPE GreenLake subscription services now includes Qumulo Hybrid Cloud File software as an as-a-Service offering.

Fujitsu resells Qumulo software as part of its storage product set. This deal was signed in January.

Finally, Arrow Electronics and Global Distribution have signed agreements with distribute Qumulo product.

Backup and recovery users love Cohesity, Rubrik and Veaam more than most, according to Gartner survey

Which backup and recovery product should you buy? Gartner’s 2020 Peer Insights survey says Rubrik and Cohesity are the most lauded and popular suppliers, followed by Veeam, Veritas, Druva, NAKIVO and Dell EMC, each with hundreds of votes.

However a  legacy VMWare product, VMware Data Protection gets a higher 100 per cent 5-star rating 0 but only from 2 voters. So too, do StorageCraft’s OneXafe, the Zerto IT Resilience Platform, Commvault’s HyperScale Appliance and Dell EMC’s Power Protect, all with a single vote apiece.

The Peer Insights survey is open to any enterprise user. Gartner asks them to rate their data centre backup and recovery product on a 1 star (low) to 5  star (top) scale. The analyst firm averages the ratings and counts the number of raters to provide the judgement of the wisdom of crowds. There are 42 products listed in the 2020 report and we have charted the top 20. 

Here they are, positioned in a 2-axis chart using the averaged rating value (right-hand vertical axis) and number of raters or votes (left-hand vertical axis); 

Blocks & Files-generated chart using Gartner numbers.

It’s a somewhat busy chart and we immediately notice that there is little correlation between the number of rating users and the rating of a product.

Rubrik Cloud Data Management gets top spot with 193 user votes and a 4.9 rating. The Cohesity DataProtect offering gets a 4.8 rating with 241 votes. Most votes – 248 – are cast for Veeam Backup & Replication and give it a 4.7 rating, making it third in the list.

However the Dell EMC Data Protection Suite gets a higher 4.8 rating, but from only 32 votes. And IBM’s Spectrum Protect Suite also gets a 4.8 rating from its mere 8 votes.

The Dell EMC Integrated Data Protection Appliance gets a 4.7 rating from 14 votes. Druva inSync gets a 4.7 from 97 votes, as does NAKIVO Backup & Replication with its 60 votes.

Gartner filters

Gartner publishes the complete list of 42 products and their suppliers as a freely-available document. This lists alphabetically the overall best suppliers for the upper-end mid-market (500 – 999 employees) and large-enterprise (1,000 staff or more) environments. They are Cohesity, Commvault, Dell EMC, Druva, Rubrik, Veeam and Veritas.

Gartner also makes filtered results available, listing the Customers’ Choices; the top suppliers and products alphabetically in four sub-categories. We understand that a  vendor’s average review rating has to be higher than the overall median rating for the market as a whole to qualify for Customers’ Choice:

  • Customers’ Choice for Large Enterprise ($1bn – $10bn revenues): Cohesity, Veeam and Veritas.
  • Customers’ Choice for Midsize Enterprise ($50m – $1bn ): Cohesity, Druva, Rubrik, Veeam and Veritas.
  • Customers’ Choice for N America: Cohesity, Commvault, Dell EMC, Druva, Rubrik, Veeam, and Veritas.
  • Customers’ Choice for EMEA: Cohesity, Rubrik, and Veeam.

Compute Express Link triumphs in the post-PCIe bus war

The Compute Express Link (CXL) bus has won the post-PCIe war and will enable disaggregated systems technology.

Alex McDonald, EMEA Chair of the SNIA, told a press briefing in London last week that AMD, ARM, and IBM have joined Intel aboard the CXL bus technology bandwagon. That’s all four main CPU vendors.

Only interconnect

We looked CXL a year ago and saw it then as a fourth future high-speed interconnect technology alongside the Gen-Z Consortium, OpenCAPI and CCIX initiatives.

CXL has the full backing of Intel and we suggested “that the sooner CCIX, Gen-Z and OpenCAPI combine the better for them. An Intel steamroller is coming their way and a single body will be harder to squash”.

They haven’t combined and in our view Gen Z, OpenCAPI and CCIX are dead in the water. They have not attracted the same degree of CPU manufacturer support – which means CXL has won the bus war.

Any post-PCIe bus technology for interconnecting processors to DRAM, FPGAs and other dedicated processors must have the support of the server CPU suppliers. It’s a sine qua non.

CXL bus features

Composable system vendors such as Liqid that use the PCIe bus are nicely placed to move into CXL bus technologies and increase the granularity of their composed systems. Blocks & Files thinks all composable systems vendors will have to support the CXL bus because of this.

In his presentation, McDonald discussed CXL bus features which make it attractive to CPU vendors and how the CXL bus could help shatter or disaggregate the integrated server (compute + DRAM + storage + networking) model which is already under attack from GPUs as well as assorted ASICs and FPGAs.

Disaggregated systems, featuring computational storage, persistent memory and server composability, all need a high-speed bus to work. This requires better-than-PCIe technology because today’s PCIe bus is too slow and does not support distributed memory.

McDonald said current servers have memory directly connected to the CPU with storage connected over buses such as SAS and SATA and, lately, the PCIe bus using NVMe. That’s the left side of the diagram below.

The right side of the diagram shows the CXL bus being used to link processors to memory, including persistent memory and NVMe, hooking up storage with a storage controller / CPU present. This storage controller can be a dedicated storage processor carrying out some form of computational storage, offloading the host server CPU.

The CXL bus can be used in systems with distributed memories and its cache coherency ensures that item updates in one part of the distributed memory system are rippled through to the copies, or caches. The current PCIe bus is not cache coherent. (Cache coherency applies to two or more memory resources, such as main memory and a cache, holding copies of data that are identical or coherent. With multi-core CPUs each core has its own cache. A cache coherent system causes cached copies of data in main memory to be invalidated when the main memory item is updated, forcing the caches to be reloaded from main memory.)

When PCIe Gen 5 with its 32Gbit/s bandwidth arrives the CXL bus protocol can run across it. The PCIe 5.0 spec was published in May last year. PCIe 4.0’s spec was finalised in 2017 and systems featuring the technology are just about to hit the market in 2020. The earliest PCIe Gen 5 systems, and hence CXL, will arrive is 2021. The general idea is that PCIe 5.0 + CXL will be used for higher performance data centre servers, while PCIe 4.0 is relegated to lower-performance servers and desktop/notebook/workstation systems.

CXL protocol elements

There are three sub-protocols in the CXL scheme and they can be used at the same time on a CXL wire. They are CXL.io, CXL.cache and CXL.memory. A diagram shows how data and processing logic blocks are connected in the CXL world;

CXL.io is basically PCIe Gen 5 and all PCIE services will work. CXL.memory enables a host CPU to access persistent memory while CXL.cache connects a host CPU to cached memory in external processing devices such as accelerators like smart NICs, GPUs, FPGAs, ASICs,  dedicated storage processors – think Pensando and Pliops. It can also be used to link computational storage devices to a host server – think Eideticom, NETINT Technologies, NGD Systems and ScaleFlux.

Lastly, CXL.memory can interconnect memory buffers when memory is expanded, providing direct memory access (DMA).


Infinidat exhibits six exabytes – good that!

Infinidat, the high-end disk-based storage array maker, today announced it has deployed more than six exabytes of storage capacity, up from 5EB six months ago.

The company anticipates continued demand for petabyte scale systems to accelerate growth in customer numbers and total storage deployment. It notes that shipping “over 1EB in less than six months is 50 per cent faster growth than the nine months prior”. (Incidentally, 1EB can represent 83,333 x 12TB disk drives; or 100 arrays at 10PB/array average; or 50 arrays at 20PB/array.)

The company argues that all-flash arrays (AFA) at scale are prohibitively expensive and in its release today pointed out that its 6EB of storage capacity is more than the top eight all-flash array (AFA) vendors shipped in 2019.

Infinidat’s marketers appear to be comparing total capacity shipped for their company with only one year’s capacity shipped by its AFA competitors. No need for that, when it is demonstrably growing so fast.

Capacity for growth

We have charted Infinidat’s deployed capacity using its own statements (e.g. 3.7 EB in September 2018); 

A fairly linear capacity deployed growth line since October 2017, but with a recent acceleration

In November 2018 Infinidat CTO Brian Carmody told Blocks & Files: “Our average customer has 7.3PB of InfiniBox, and our largest have over 100 PB.” A 10PB/array average looks to be not unreasonable 14 months later.

InfiniBox upgrade

Infinidat today updated InfiniBox Storage Software to Release 5.0.11. The upgrade adds replication with Active-Active Consistency Groups, support for the FIPS-140-2 federal data protection standard and makes changes for the next generation of its DRAM/NAND Neural Cache engine. This speeds read and write data accesses.

Scality preps scale-out file system on Azure Blob Storage

Scality is developing a scale-out file system (SOFS) for Microsoft Azure Blob storage.

The company is building a cloud-native scale-out file system in the Azure Cloud using Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB to store file system metadata and file data payloads stored as objects in the Azure Blob service.

Paul Speciale, Scality chief product officer, told a press briefing in London last week that “Microsoft does not have a big fat file system in Azure” for unstructured data.

He said Azure Blob is designed for large amounts of unstructured object data, not files. Scality’s idea is to offer file services to hold large volumes of unstructured file data on Azure Blob storage as a lower-cost, high-capacity file storage tier.

According to Scality such a file system must support:

  • Thousands of clients in a scale-out fashion,
  • Deliver a minimum of 350MB/sec on single file transfers,
  • Support SMB and be Blob API-compatible,
  • Run in a customer’s cloud subscription,
  • Object storage economics.

Scality RING has scale-out file system capability and Scality is already familiar with Azure Blob Storage, Speciale said.

For example, RING has a certified Azure Blob API and can provide local storage for an Azure Stack on-premises system. Scality’s Connect for Azure Blob Storage enables any application that works with Amazon S3 to support Azure Blob Storage. It uses Azure Blob Storage API calls to map S3 Buckets and Objects to Azure Containers and Blobs.

Scality RING is already used outside Azure to provide scale-out file system resources with 10PB and 20PB SMB shares and up to 1P per day ingest rates. Customers include more than 30 hospitals, several national libraries and a US Department of National Energy Lab.

SOFS in Azure

Scality SOFS supports SMB with scale-out functionality and will host within the customer’s Azure account. It is namespace compatible with Azure Blob and S3 APIs, and there is policy-based tiering between Azure Block Blob tiers (Premium, Hot, Cool, Archive).

Initial performance tests of the Scality Blob SOFS, using the Azure Blob Premium service ($0.20/GB), show 400MB/sec single stream read and write to a single client over SMB. Cache reads reach 800MB/sec.

Blocks & Files expects Scality SOFS for Azure Blob storage to be announced later this year. Scality is also developing a single management facility for multiple clouds and multiple RINGS.

Scality is working with Microsoft to identify early customers in oil and gas seismic exploration, biopharma (genomic research simulations) and financial services (fraud detection, tradings).

Plans are also afoot for an Azure Marketplace presence alongside Scality’s Zenko Azure Connect, which provides S3 to Blob translation.

Azure and files

There are three other file offerings for Azure, none of which satisfy a requirement for storing massive amounts of unstructured data.

Microsoft Azure Files offers fully-managed cloud file shares accessible via the SMB protocol. There are premium shares for performance-sensitive, IO intensive workloads and standard shares for general purpose file storage.

Microsoft-owned Avere Systems supports a file system in Azure. According to Speciale, Microsoft positions Avere as a cloud edge service, focused on getting data into the Azure cloud.

Azure NetApp Files provides NetApp’s ONTAP file services on the Azure cloud. This is designed for running mission-critical apps in Azure, not for storing large amounts of unstructured data.

Scality SOFS would complement these file services.

Rubrik claims $600m revenue run-rate

Data management startup Rubrik this week said it achieved a $600m annualised gross bookings run rate for the fiscal 2020 year ended January 31.

The company’s fy17 total bookings run rate approached $100m and the fiscal ’18 amount was around $300m. Rubrik did not provide a run rate for its fiscal ’19 year and declined to do so when we asked. The fy18 number though had more than doubled by the end of fy 2020.

About half of the fiscal ’20 bookings came from customers who spent $1m or more on Rubrik products and services to date. Subscriptions accounted for nearly half of bookings by the end of the year.

Rubrik said it finished fiscal ’20 with more than 2,500 customers. It has previously reported relative customer number growth, saying it was 4x in fiscal ’18 and 7x in fiscal ’17.

Rival Cohesity achieved a $200m run rate in its fiscal 2018. The company trumpeted another good year for FY 2019 ended July 31, 2019. However, Cohesity did not reveal a revenue run-rate for the year, presumably because it was navigating the migration to a software-only business and therefore no longer has hardware revenues to tot up.

Despite the apparent disparity in size between the two companies, Rubrik fared less well than Cohesity in the GigaOm Radar for Hybrid Cloud Protection, published this week. By our reading of this market landscape, report author Enrico Signoretti considers Rubrik as less mature than Cohesity and both are behind Commvault. But Rubrik is making the transition from  feature-led supplier to more of a platform play, according to Signoretti.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is Radar-screen-gigaom.jpg

Size does not matter for the GigaOm analyst, who “does not take into account the market share of each vendor, in order to “give a clearer view of the potential of each vendor. It is a forward-looking market landscape representation that leaves more room for innovation and differentiation, instead of weighting established positions”.

Rubrik buys Opas AI

The company last week announced the acquisition of Opas AI, a company specialising in artificial intelligence for root cause analysis. Terms were undisclosed.

Vinod Marur, senior vice president of engineering at Rubrik, said in a blog post announcing the news: “With Opas AI’s technology, we see a near-term opportunity to enhance our product offerings to provide our customers more proactive alerting and shorter problem resolution cycles when faults occur. This will in turn translate into increased availability of data and applications across any cloud or infrastructure.”

Toshiba selects Showa Denko platters for MAMR HDDs

Showa Denko (SDK), the Japanese chemicals and electronics company, among other things, makes platters for disk drive makers such as Toshiba. A 2019 annual results report reveals it is making MAMR (Microwave-assisted Magnetic Recording) platters for Toshiba.

MAMR drives have read-write heads beaming microwaves at bit value locations on the platter to make the recording medium more receptive to write impulses from the head. They are an alternative to HAMR (Heat-assisted Magnetic Recording) drives which use laser-generated heat to accomplish the same purpose.

Toshiba 16TB MG08 disk drive.

SDK has also developed HAMR platter technology. Seagate is relying on in-house manufactured HAMR technology to take its disk drive capacities past 16 to 18TB and onwards to 40TB and beyond. Current PMR (Perpendicular Magnetic Recording) technology cannot get past a 16TB/disk barrier.

Western Digital is starting to deploy in-house developed elements of MAMR technology in its 18TB and 20TB drives.

Toshiba has previously indicated it is leaning towards using MAMR technology. This SDK report shows that it is serious about a MAMR push. The SDK MAMR platters hold 2TB each. The SDK report say they have been adopted by Toshiba Electronic Devices & Storage Corporation for use in MAMR-technology-based 18 terabyte near-line HDD.”

SDK began shipping the 2TB MAMR platters to Toshiba last year. This implies that Toshiba could announce an 18TB nearline disk drive later his year. Its current largest capacity disk is the 16TB MG08, which was announced in September 2019.

Shingled magnetic recording diagram

Blocks & Files expects a Toshiba MG09 18TB drive announcement later this year, possibly with an enhanced capacity shingled media drive with 20TB. These use the same platters but drive software causes wider write tracks to be partially overlapped so that more, and narrower, read tracks can be added to the platters.

Kioxia NVMe SSDs use PCie 4.0 for big speed increase

Kioxia has launched two much faster than average NVMe SSDs – the CD6 and CM6, – which use the PCIe 4.0 bus to reach 1 million IOPS and beyond.

The CD4 and CD6 are enterprise class flash drives, designed for data centre use. The CD4 is single-ported and the CM6 is dual-ported, and therefore faster. They succeed Kioxia’s CD5 and CM5 drives.

Kioxia (formerly called Toshiba Memory) said they are the first data centre PCIe v4.0 drives to ship and their performance numbers (see below) suggest that servers fitted with PCIe v4.0 will get data in and out of memory much faster than current PCIe v3 servers.

The PCIe 4.0 bus delivers up to 64GB/sec, double PCIe gen 3’s 32GB/sec maximum. Now we wait for PCIe 4.0-compliant servers to ship with these drives.

The CD6 and CM6 come in mixed-use and read-intensive versions and are built from Kioxia’s BiCS 4 NAND – 96-layer 3D NAND formatted as TLC (3bits/cell). The read-intensive versions have higher capacities and lower endurance ratings as the mixed-use models have capacity set aside for over-provisioning (replacing worn-out cells). 

The CM6 has a maximum 30.72TB capacity, which is a third more than Western Digital’s DC HC650 3.5-inch 20TB disk drive.

Kioxia CM6 and CM6 capacities and “up to” performance numbers. TBD means “to be defined.”

The headline numbers are up to 6.9GB/sec sequential read bandwidth and 1.4 million random read IOPS.

This is faster than Gigabyte’s Aorus PCIe 4.0 SSD with its 5GB/sec sequential read speed.

Compared to Kioxia’s CM5 drive (PCIe v3.0, 64-layer TLC NAND) the CM6 has up to 106 per cent more bandwidth than the CM5, 134 per cent more random read IOPS, 386 per cent more random write IOPS and 67 per cent lower latency.

Both drives come in a U.3 format, meaning they will fit in tri-mode 2.5-inch drive bays. These support SATA, SAS and NVMe connectivity. The drives are self-encrypting to a FIPS standard.

Western Digital is a partner of Kioxia in building NAND chips, so we can anticipate the company to announce PCIe 4.0 SSDs soon.

Commvault looms large on hybrid cloud data protection radar screen

A GigaOm analyst has positioned hybrid cloud data protection vendors in the market, with a radar screen diagram to indicate strengths and focus.

Fourteen vendors are covered in the GigaOm Radar for Hybrid Cloud Data Protection. They are Actifio, Acronis, Clumio, Cohesity, Commvault, Delphix, Druva, HYCU, IBM, Rubrik, StorageCraft, Veeam, Veritas and Zerto.

By our reckoning the GigaOm Radar shows Commvault is the strongest supplier. Also Rubrik is considered less mature than Cohesity but is transitioning from feature-lead supplier to more of a platform play. Acronis and Veeam are given slightly higher ratings than Rubrik as challengers moving to leaders’ status.

According to report author Enrico Signoretti, the “general market direction is trending towards additional services built on top of data protection. Data protection is becoming instrumental in collecting and consolidating data across the entire organisation (no matter where it is created or stored) with the goal of reusing it for other purposes.”

GigaOm Radar details

GigaOm’s Radar is a four-circle, four-axis, four-quadrant diagram. The circles form concentric rings and a supplier’s status – new entrant, challenger, or leader – is indicated by placement in a ring.

There is a progression, with new entrants growing to become challengers and then, if all goes well, leaders.

 The inner white area is for mature and consolidated markets, with very few vendors remaining and offerings that are mature, comparable, and without much space for further innovation. This is not the case with data protection.

Signoretti does not take into account the market share of each vendor, in order to “give a clearer view of the potential of each vendor. It is a forward-looking market landscape representation that leaves more room for innovation and differentiation, instead of weighting established positions.”

There are four orthogonal axes, each with a progression from low (outer ring) to high (innermost ring);

  • Maturity – the maturity and solidity of the product, user acceptance of the solution, and overall ecosystem sustainability,
  • Horizontal platform play – products that can face a broader range of challenges, with a comprehensive feature set and an extensive ecosystem,
  • Innovation – differentiation of the solution, innovative technical aspects, and overall vendor approach to the market,
  • Feature play – focus of the solution in terms of single differentiating features and technical aspects of the product. It usually includes new vendors that are defining new product categories, niche players, and point solutions.

Slow, fast and out-performer arrows are placed on the diagram by each vendor, indicating their current position, direction and speed of progress. And, yes, out-performers are faster moving than fast movers.

Signoretti aims to provide readers a better understanding of a technology, to help them evaluate it, and explore the market to find the best products for their organisation. The Radar should be considered a companion piece to two other GigaOm reports: ‘Key Criteria to Evaluate Hybrid Cloud Data Protection’ and ‘Vendor Profiles for Key Criteria’.

We understand that Dell EMC’s Data Protection Suite may be added to a forthcoming edition of the Radar for Hybrid Cloud Data Protection report.

Comment

GigaOm’s radar screen is an alternative representation to Gartner’s classic four-box Magic Quadrant, Forrester’s Wave, IDC’s Marketscape, and Coldago’s Map, which are shown below, clockwise from the top left;

The radar screen seems to combine graphic elements of Forrester’s Wave and Gartner’s MQ. By having four axes it has more classification criteria by which to position vendors. These four axes form two pairs; innovation vs maturity and horizontal platform vs feature play.

Vendors have to be placed with reference to these, which is how they end up as points in the quadrants. You cannot have a vendor simultaneously rated high on maturity and innovation or on a horizontal play and a feature play in the GigaOm universe.

HPE Primera gains Veeam V10 support

HPE has announced Veeam support for its Primera high-end storage array and for disaster recovery data copies made by its StoreOnce software.

Veeam already supports HPE’s 3PAR and Nimble storage arrays and HPE’s hyperconverged SimpliVity line. With this week’s announcement of Veeam Availability Suite V10, the two companies have added Primera storage arrays to the mix.

With the VAS v10 support Primera users can recover data at granular levels and in minutes from storage snapshots made in virtualized and physical environments. StoreOnce is HPE”s deduping backup storage target appliance.

Veeam’s StoreOnce support provides a single interface for data protection and includes Catalyst Copy support. This stores, replicates and archives additional copies of data for disaster recovery. According to HPE the process does not affect backup service level agreements or constrain server CPU resources.

The HPE Veeam announcement does not mention S3 Object Lock support for immutable archive copies of data. We’re checking with HPE to clarify this.

Veeam v10 will be available for HPE Primera and StoreOnce customers this month.

SK hynix sends 800 workers home to self-quarantine against coronavirus

Coronavirus

SK hynix, the Korean flash and DRAM maker, has sent home 800 workers from its Incheon campus in South Korea as a self-quarantine precaution against the COVID-19 coronavirus.

The company said a new recruit has showed symptoms of pneumonia and was transported to a nearby hospital for tests. The recruit had been in close contact with a coronavirus patient in Daegu, 300 kilometres southeast of Seoul, where South Korea’s health authorities  have reported more than 10 COVID-19 cases.

SK hynix has shut down its in-house clinic, visited by the new recruit, and also closed its education centre, sending 280 new recruits home.

The company’s Incheon campus is 70 kilometres south of Seoul and employs some 15,000 workers. SK hynix said the self-quarantine measure has not affected operations of the chip fabs on the site.

Cohesity branches out data management software to ROBO and the edge

Cohesity has upgraded its data management software to cover remote office – branch office (ROBO) and edge IT sites, in a single environment along with central data centres.

Cohesity’s hyperconverged secondary storage platform offers backup, golden master file copies for test and dev, compliance and other data users, archiving, tiering to the cloud and general file and object storage.

Its market sweet spot to date has been hybrid, covering business data centres and the public cloud. Now it is extending from the data centre base to branch offices and data-generating IoT edge locations. The software runs as a virtual appliance or on certified HPE and Cisco servers.

Vineet Abraham, Cohesity SVP for engineering and product management, said in a statement: “By offering the enterprise-class features of Cohesity software in a cost-effective, plug-and-play solution, we are empowering organisations to bring their data centre, cloud, and edge together on a single platform.”

Backup to the Edge

Cohesity ROBO and edge users get instant mass restores to recover an entire branch when needed. Cohesity’s dedupe and compression reduces bandwidth utilisation when sending/receiving data to/from central or cloud sites. Cohesity also suggests its file and object services can replace local Windows file servers.

For Cohesity the edge includes branches of national banks, retailers, chain restaurants, rental car agencies, warehousing and distribution, pharmaceutical, and global IT services. Data from these sites typically need to be managed, protected, and secured locally, without dedicated IT staff to handle on-site administration.

Cohesity cites IDC research that shows more than half of enterprise data will be created and processed outside the data centre or cloud by 2022. According to the company, this underscores the need for a unified approach covering ROBO, the edge, enterprise data centres and public cloud.

Cohesity’s ROBO offering will be generally available to customers from Cisco and HPE by Spring 2020.